Published surveys and studies and ETS’ viewpoint on the hygiene benefits of tissue.
Comparison of different hand drying methods the potential for airborne microbe dispersal and contamination (University of Westminster peer reviewed study 2015)
- Read more on University of Westminster peer reviewed study
Microbiological comparison of hand drying methods: the potential for contamination of the environment, user and bystander (Leeds University peer reviewed study 2014)
- read more on Leeds University peer reviewed study
Alcohol based disinfectant vs hand washing which fights noroviruses better (peer reviewed article 2015)
Eurofins-Inlab study: measured the microorganisms in washrooms equipped with different hand drying systems (2012)
- Read more on Eurofins-Inlab study
“Intermetra Survey” – Multi-country survey of the consumers’ attitudes to different hand drying systems
- Full text “Intermetra Study” – Study of the consumers’ attitudes to different handdrying systems (Juni2008)
- Press release: According to Intermetra study, with hygiene top of mind – Europeans prefer to dry their hands with paper towels!
- Translations of the press release:
“Westminster University 2010 Study” – A comparative scientific study of four different hand drying methods: paper towel, continuous roller towel, warm air dryer, jet air dryer.
- Full text of the 2010 Westminster University: A comparative study of four different hand drying methods: paper towel, continuous roller towel,warm air dryer, jet air dryer.
“Westminster University 2008 Study” – A comparative scientific study of three different hand drying methods: paper towel, warm air dryer, jet air dryer.
- Full text of the “Westminster Study” – A comparative study on different hand drying methods: paper towel, warm air dryer, jet air dryer (Nov2008)
- Presentation of the main findings of this recent study (Feb2009)
- Summary of the comparative study (March2010)
- Westminster University Study – Key findings (Feb 2009)
- Press release: New evidence suggest electric hand dryers in public toilets pose health risk (Feb2009)
- Westminster University Study 1993
- Westminster University Study 1994
Mayo Clinic Proceedings: a review of the evidence published in 2012
TUV Studies comparing the hygiene of different methods for drying the hands
- “TÜV Study” – Study conducted with regard to the different methods used for drying hands (Sep 2005)
- “TÜV Study” – Final Report on Hand drying high speed or stream vs tissue by TUV Rheinland 08-2011
The Handwashingforlife Institute is devoted to advancing the science of hand hygiene with the purpose of reducing the incidence of food borne illness and nosocomial infections caused by poor hand hygiene. It is a global organization in support of solving the common hand hygiene challenges around the world.
University of Erlangen – Hygiene evaluation of tissue handkerchief for nose cleaning –(1994)
Comparative tests revealed that tissue handkerchiefs used for nose cleaning contained considerably less bacteria than conventional textile handkerchiefs. The results applied also to pathogenic bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Tissue handkerchiefs are – in terms of hygiene and prevention from infection – significantly better than textile handkerchiefs.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae